Build it yourself, or with an engineer from the team. Get started.

BlogLLMOps

// guide

LLMOps: running prompts and agents in production

LLMOps is the operational discipline for prompts and agents in production: versioning every change, observing every call, holding cost to a budget, and keeping behaviour inside a variance you have measured. It is what turns a prompt that works in a demo into a service a product can depend on.

The prompt is the most important code in the codebase and usually the least engineered: a string copied between branches, with no record of what it looked like last Tuesday, no number that says whether today's change is better, and a bill that compounds with every loop step. LLMOps gives that string the treatment the rest of the stack already has. The articles below cover its parts in turn: what a prompt version records, what to trace so "why did my agent do that?" has an answer, where the cost goes and how to enforce a ceiling rather than monitor one, and what to do about a model that is non-deterministic even at temperature zero.

The scale of the problem is real. Enterprise LLM API spending more than doubled in six months, rising from $3.5 billion in late 2024 to $8.4 billion by mid-2025 as workloads moved into production, and 37% of enterprises now spend over $250,000 per year on LLMs. Per task, running an AI agent in production costs $0.0003 to over $0.50, a range that spans three orders of magnitude; and without a hard ceiling the outliers are the story: one multi-agent pipeline looped for 264 hours, at a final cost of $47,000, from a system budgeted at under $200 a month.

Articles on LLMOps (8)

FAQ

What is LLMOps?
LLMOps is the operational discipline for prompts and agents in production: versioning every change, observing every call, holding cost to a budget, and keeping behaviour inside a measured variance. It covers the lifecycle after the prompt works: deploy, trace, measure, roll back.
How is LLMOps different from MLOps?
MLOps manages models you train: data pipelines, training runs, model registries. LLMOps manages behaviour you rent: the model is a provider's, so the operational surface is the prompt, the tools, the context, the version and the call, and the risks are regressions you did not cause, non-determinism and cost that compounds per step.
What does prompt versioning record?
Every change to a prompt as an immutable version: the instruction text, the model identifier, the parameters and the output schema, with its own evaluation results, so "what changed?" and "roll it back" are one-line answers rather than archaeology. Git alone does not do this, because the model and its parameters live outside the repository.
What should LLM observability capture?
Every call's input, output, status, model, cost and tokens, and for an agent every step: each tool call with its arguments, result, latency and error. On top of the trace, quality signal from evals and a cost view by version and by key, so a regression, a loop and a spend spike are each visible before a user reports them.

The LLM ops platform, in one page

Functional AI is the LLM ops platform: evaluation, runtime and observability for prompts and agents. Build your prompt or agent as an Agentic Function; it evaluates it, runs it, traces every call, and lets you ship a new version without redeploying.

What Functional AI is →

// get started

Ship agents you can trust.

Build your prompt or agent as an Agentic Function. Functional AI evaluates it, runs it, and traces every call — and you ship new versions anytime, straight from your code. Build it yourself, or with an engineer from the team that built the platform.